CAN FASTING BE GOOD FOR YOU? TWO STUDIES REVEAL HOW IT CHANGES THE BODY

Can fasting be good for you? Two studies reveal how it changes the body

by KATIE MACBRIDE

RESEARCHERS STUDYING calorie restriction and intermittent fasting agree that how we eat — or don’t eat — can affect our longevity.

Among those same researchers, however, is debate over which practice is actually responsible for the well-documented health benefits.

Studies, mostly in animals, have linked molecular, metabolic, and antiaging benefits to both calorie restriction and intermittent fasting. But it’s difficult to parse exactly why scientists are observing this, mainly because of the inherent nature of this work.

For example, calorie restriction studies in rodents typically have the animals eat once per day, rapidly consuming their food. This unintentionally results in fasting — which is more defined as an eating pattern that revolves around meal timing.

However, two recent studies both argue fasting is responsible for these help benefits more so than calorie restriction.

Scientists led by researchers from the University of Wisconsin wanted to parse the differing effects of fasting and calorie restriction. A study published Monday in Nature Metabolism found that when mice were on a specific type of fasting diet, it resulted in the most health benefits.

A different study, published last week in Nature Metabolism found that similar benefits could be achieved through a diet that “mimicked” fasting.

Valter Longo, director of the University of Southern California’s Longevity Institute and lead author of the second study, tells Inverse these conclusions are in line with the way research has been moving.

“Just reducing calories has been studied for 100 years,” Longo says, “but it’s never really gone anywhere because it doesn’t lead to too many benefits.”

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW FIRST — Intermittent fasting is less about what you eat than when you eat. There are a variety of different options, but people who practice intermittent fasting often do it one of three ways.

  • The 16:8 schedule (16 hours of fasting, then a set window of 8 hours for food and drink)
  • The 5:2 (eating normally for 5 days, fasting or eating very few calories for 2)
  • Alternate-day fasting, or periodic fasting with occasional consecutive fasting periods

Calorie restriction (CR) is more about what you eat than when. When someone is on a calorie-restricted diet, they eat fewer calories than they typically would, while still getting all the nutrients they need throughout the day.

Researchers led by scientists from the University of Wisconsin wanted to determine which diet yielded more health benefits in mice.

HOW THE DISCOVERY WAS MADE— The scientists put three groups of male mice on different diets, all of which reduced their daily calorie intake by 30 percent for 16 weeks. Each group had different access to their food:

  • Group 1 had unlimited access to their food
  • Group 2 received food in three equal meals spaced over a 12 hour period
  • Group 3 was trained to rapidly eat all the food at once, which resulted in them fasting for the rest of the day.

Mice receiving a normal diet tailored to rodents without calorie restriction acted as controls.

WHAT THEY FOUND — The researchers found fasting was necessary for “insulin sensitivity” which the researchers explain is “a key physiological hallmark” for calorie restriction in mammals. They also found fasting increased fatty acid oxidation and reduced age-related frailty.

Further, the researchers found that “fasting improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, reduces adiposity and increases fatty acid oxidation,” all of which have been linked to health benefits and longevity. While calorie restriction was inherent in the study design, it was the fasting that spurred the positive changes.

While the authors note humans are not mice and more research needs to be done, they also say this suggests fasting is responsible for many of the health benefits often associated with calorie-restricted diets.

One of the challenges with translating those results to humans, says Longo, who didn’t work on the study but describes it as “elegant,” is that humans have a much harder time only eating once per day than rodents in a lab who are forced to only eat once per day.

That’s why Longo wanted to study the effect of a fasting-mimicking diet to see if the known benefits of fasting could be achieved in a way humans were more likely to adhere to.

WHAT IS A FASTING-MIMICKING DIET?— In contrast to a calorie-restricted diet, which simply reduces the number of calories consumed, a fasting-mimicking diet, Longo explains, is much more carefully calibrated…

more…

https://www.inverse.com/mind-body/fasting-versus-caloric-restriction

F. Kaskais Web Guru

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s